Commercial Crime Exclusions for Accounting Firms

Understanding what Commercial Crime does NOT cover for Accounting Firms

Accounting Firms purchasing Commercial Crime should expect 15-30 exclusions in the policy form. Most are routine and unremarkable. A small subset — typically 3-5 trade-specific exclusions — matters operationally and should be reviewed carefully before binding.

For professional services firm, the meaningful exclusions usually target the riskiest aspects of the operation: the activities most likely to produce claims, where the carrier wants either explicit exclusion or buy-back endorsements at additional premium.

The exclusions Accounting Firms actually need to watch on Commercial Crime

Accounting Firms Commercial Crime policies typically include exclusions that reflect the specific risk profile of the professional services firm segment. The exclusions are not arbitrary — they exist because carriers have priced (or refused to price) for the underlying exposures based on actual loss experience.

Reading the trade-specific exclusion list carefully before binding is the single best way to avoid claim-time surprises. Carriers won't hide exclusions, but they also won't volunteer them; the policy form lists them, and the accounting firm (or broker) has to read the form.

The pollution exclusion on Accounting Firms Commercial Crime

The total pollution exclusion on most commercial general liability and adjacent Commercial Crime policies removes coverage for pollution-related losses. For Accounting Firms with any meaningful environmental exposure — fuel handling, chemical use, waste generation, hazardous materials — this exclusion can be operationally significant.

The fix is usually a dedicated pollution liability policy, sometimes endorsed onto the existing Commercial Crime via a pollution buy-back. The cost varies by exposure but typically adds 5-15% to the base Commercial Crime cost for modest exposures, more for material ones.

Why intentional acts are excluded from Accounting Firms Commercial Crime

The intentional-acts exclusion on Accounting Firms Commercial Crime is rarely a problem for legitimate business activity. The exclusion targets situations the carrier won't insure regardless of intent: criminal acts, fraud, deliberate property damage. Routine commercial operations don't trigger it.

Where the exclusion gets murky: dispute scenarios where one party characterizes the other's actions as intentional. Carriers usually defer to the courts on intent determinations, but a coverage dispute can develop while the underlying claim is pending.

Buy-back endorsements that fill Commercial Crime gaps for Accounting Firms

Many Commercial Crime exclusions can be partially or fully restored by endorsements at additional premium. The standard buy-backs for Accounting Firms on Commercial Crime:

• Pollution buy-back: restores coverage for some pollution-related losses (typically gradual seepage or sudden-and-accidental, depending on form)
• Contractual liability extension: broadens insured-contract coverage to handle wider indemnity language
• Watercraft/aircraft: restores coverage for owned, leased, or rented water/aircraft if the accounting firm uses any
• Care, custody, and control (CCC): covers damage to others' property in the accounting firm's care

Each buy-back has a premium cost; the cost-benefit depends on the accounting firm's actual exposure to the excluded risk.

How Commercial Crime exclusion lists vary across carriers for Accounting Firms

Carrier-to-carrier exclusion variation on Accounting Firms Commercial Crime ranges from minor (slight wording differences) to material (entirely different exclusions or buy-backs). Standard-market carriers tend to be closer to ISO baseline; surplus carriers often have heavier exclusion lists reflecting their specialty risk appetite.

The exclusion comparison is part of the placement decision. Quotes that exclude more should price meaningfully lower, not just modestly. If two quotes are within 5% on price but one has materially more exclusions, the apparent savings probably don't justify the gap.

The pre-bind exclusion review on Accounting Firms Commercial Crime

Before binding Commercial Crime, Accounting Firms should review the exclusion list with their broker. The conversation: which exclusions apply to your operation, which materially affect coverage, which can be bought back, and at what cost. A 30-minute review prevents most claim-time exclusion problems.

For professional services firm, the review should focus on the trade-specific exclusions, not the universal ones. The intentional-acts exclusion is universal and rarely matters; the pollution and professional-services exclusions are more specific and often matter.